/
2025-01-10 Module 3: Taxonomy workshops

2025-01-10 Module 3: Taxonomy workshops

About workshops

5 exercises

Business case, audience definition, verb identification, noun identification, metadata field prioritization

  • 12-18 people

  • Mix of users - x-hierarchical, x-functional, geographically dispersed, mix of tenure

  • ‘horse-shoe’ configuration of how users are seated (C-shaped seating arrangement)

    • facilitating a debate, keeps everyone aligned and on equal footing

  • We learn by seeing, hearing, doing, and questioning

Why we care about this

  • gives us a quick start to tax design so that the business case and scope emerges quickly

  • creates core group of stakeholders who get tax

  • breaks down traditional org thinking and allows users to open up to new concepts

  • established long-term stewards for enterprise technology

Facilitation style

  • turn-based facilitation - go around the table, hear from each person

  • assign, write, present, discuss

    • now do this, each person writes what they think (silence), tell group what they’ve written, facilitator manages discussion

  • requires strong facilitator with clear mandate

Workshop concept

  • each piece builds on the previous piece

  • understand and baseline tax

  • develop clear list of primary metadata fields

  • create starter tax

  • develop clear path to first implementable version of the tax

Workshop exercises

Business case

  • make sure all participants are on the same page

    • why are they there?

    • what’s the shared goal?

  • understand what a business tax is

  • why we need it

  • what will it do

Audience definition

Gives a baseline for participants' thinking/consideration to design the common vocab.

  • part 1: list all potential user types - who are we designing for?

  • part 2: what makes these types of users different?

  • part 3: take differences and create personas; define our lowest common denominators as personas

    • persona - fake person and tell the story of that person. in design activities, refer back to that person to ensure that it will work for them.

    • personas represent the lowest common denominator

Verb identification

  • identify the things we do as an organization.

  • identify what people will do in the system (train, acquire, sell, research, search, browse, research, teach, learn, find, store, save, share, collaborate, develop, etc.)

    • keep repeated terms

    • limit number of terms a person contributes

  • move away from organization lines and on to clear topics

  • people have missions - these vers should align with a user’s missio or need for information

Noun identification

  • some things will be too broad or too specific

  • eliminate non-topics, distractions or words that are too broad or specific, but keep them all

  • Map topics through discussion (slide 87) into categories. All primary topics are fitting into a subset of categories.

    • you will have eliminated a bunch of words, but they’re still valuable. Have a second chair taking notes how words are described - helps capture synonyms.

  • Here’s what we will have already accomplished at the top levles

    • we have defined our core topics

    • develop the starting points for other metadata fields

    • started constructing vocabulary: core terms and synonyms

  • Repeat this at every level at each increasing level of detail.

Metadata field prioritization

  • identify non-topics and raise them for discussion as possible secondary or tertiary metadata fields.

  • how to handle too many nouns

    • strive to keep under 15, 10 is ideal. above 15 you lose the standard usability design - the avg person has to read a list and decide what to pick.

    • If you’re struggling, you’re probably combining topics with non-topics

    • half hour on verbs with the rest of the time on nouns

Follow-on process

  • the workshop method can be repeated with different groups to gain consensus

  • can be repeated with different levels of detail or focus in order to expand or refine

  • the most important 1/3 of the tax design puzzle